Reiko
  • Home
  • About Us
      • Back
      • Trustees
      • Our Objectives
      • Our Mission
      • PSGR Past Trustees 
  • Contact Us
      • Back
      • Join PSGR
  • Precautionary Principle
  • Global Responsibility

  • You are here:  
  • Home
  • RESPONSES/SUBMISSIONS TO PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS
  • Submissions: General
  • General government
  • 2021 Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Bill

Publications & Resources

  • GENERAL GOVERNMENT
  • MINISTRY OF HEALTH (MoH)
  • MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT (MfE)
  • MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES (MPI)
  • NZ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY (NZEPA)
  • FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND (FSANZ)
  • ROYAL COMMISSIONS
  • LOCAL POLICY: TERRITORIAL & LOCAL COUNCILS (TLAs)
  • INTERNATIONAL

PSGR's submission to the 2021 December 2 -  Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Bill discussed the problem of an absence of consultation with the public, while a large private consultation with 'targeted stakeholders' occurred. (Link to submission)

The submission discussed the challenge of stewarding increasingly complex technologies. Policy has not produced a values-based framework (which might have arisen from consultation with the public) to appropriately govern digital identity in such a way that is protective of human rights, and appropriately anticipatory (such as of the challenges thrown up by AI). This is important as challenges thrown up by new technologies - if not framed by values-based ethics - often tend to be governed instrumentally in such a way that is not protective of public or environmental health.

Also discussed were issues of power imbalance, potential conflicts of interest in the business activities of prospective multinational providers, and a requirement, in the public interest to establish adequate resourcing in order to research, and potentially counter the claims of the regulated entities - the trusted framework providers. The policy did not discuss, or downplayed the requirement to resource an appropriate New Zealand-based independent science, technology and ethics network, outside of large, vested interests - in order to appropriately understand current and prospective risks presented by digital identity technologies.

Download

Information

  • NEWS NOW: GENE TECH & SCIENCE REFORM SHORT-CIRCUITED?
  • SCIENCE FOR PUBLIC GOOD
  • PSGR REPORTS & PAPERS
  • RESPONSES/SUBMISSIONS TO PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS
    • GENERAL GOVERNMENT
    • MINISTRY OF HEALTH (MoH)
    • MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT (MfE)
    • MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES (MPI)
    • NZ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY (NZEPA)
    • FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND (FSANZ)
    • ROYAL COMMISSIONS
      • 2000 NZ Royal Commission on Genetic Modification
      • NZ Royal Commission COVID-19 Lessons Learned
    • LOCAL POLICY: TERRITORIAL & LOCAL COUNCILS (TLAs)
    • INTERNATIONAL
  • ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION
  • FLUORIDATED DRINKING WATER
  • GENETICS & EPIGENETICS
  • LINKS
  • TAKING ACTION
  • PROPAGANDA
  • REGULATORY CAPTURE
  • GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE/LETTERS
    • Letters & Emails - New Zealand
    • Ombudsman
    • New Zealand Councils

Topics

  • PSGR IN CONVERSATION WITH SCIENTISTS & DOCTORS
  • 2024 UPDATE: SCIENCE, GOVERNANCE & HEALTH
  • 2024 PAPER: BIG RISK! WHEN CBDCs ARE TIED TO DIGITAL IDs
  • STEWARDING: DIGITAL GOVERNMENT & IDENTITY
  • STEWARDING: GENE EDITING TECHNOLOGY
  • STEWARDING: FRESHWATER
  • STEWARDING: ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS (NOVEL ENTITIES)
  • STEWARDING: MENTAL & METABOLIC HEALTH
  • COVID-19 / Sars-Cov-2

Providing scientific & medical information & analysis in the service of the public's right to be independently informed on issues relating to human & environmental health.



  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Who's Online

We have 99 guests online


 

© Physicians and Scientists for Global Responsibility New Zealand Charitable Trust